William G. Schwab and Associates
811 Blakeslee Blvd. Dr. East (PA Route 443) PO Box 56 Lehighton, PA 18235
Tel 610-377-5200 Fax 610-377-5209
Bankruptcy April 26, 2015
Personal Injury
Criminal Law
Elder Law
Estate Planning/Probate
Real Estate

Defrauding Creditors in Bankruptcy

Bankruptcy fraud has become a common way for debtors to abuse and manipulate a system that was intended to help ...(more)


Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Does Not Discharge Consumer Debts Owed For Luxury Goods

Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, also called "straight bankruptcy," generally discharges all debts incurred prior to the debtor's filing, and is intended ...(more)


Restrictions on the Debtor's Use of Cash Collateral in a Chapter 11 Case

In order to facilitate reorganization in a Chapter 11 case, Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code allows a Chapter 11 ...(more)


Discharging Debt Balance for Hardship Beyond Debtor's Control Under Chapter 13

Chapter 13 bankruptcy allows a debtor to reorganize debt according to a court-approved repayment plan, which provides for the scheduled ...(more)


Bankruptcy Law In The News

Former NFL Quarterback Vince Young Files For Bankruptcy

Central California Diocese Files for Bankruptcy

Duke Energy settles suit over Crescent bankruptcy

Detroit water department mediation to continue next week

Detroit bankruptcy plan threatens survivor benefits of families of fallen cops, firefighters

The Absolute Priority Rule in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Cases

In a Chapter 11 bankruptcy case for business reorganization, a bankruptcy court must only confirm a debtor's business reorganization plan if the plan is "fair and equitable" to the impaired class of creditors in the case.  When determining whether to confirm a debtor's Chapter 11 reorganization plan as "fair and equitable," a court will apply the Absolute Priority Rule (Rule).  The Rule generally requires that "senior" classes of creditors be paid in full before any value can be provided to a "junior" class.
Payment Requirements
Codified in Title 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, the Absolute Priority Rule essentially requires that creditors be paid in the following order of priority:
  • Secured claims (lien holders)
  • Claims incurred during the course of the bankruptcy
  • Pre-petition priority claims (taxes, wages, consumer deposits)
  • Claims of unsecured creditors
  • Equity holders (stockholders)
Each of these classes of creditors is further categorized as priority and non-priority.  For example, the category "unsecured creditors" will be further subdivided into "priority unsecured creditors" and "non-priority unsecured creditors."
Application of the Absolute Priority Rule
The Absolute Priority Rule only applies when at least one of the senior impaired classes in a Chapter 11 case does not accept the debtor's reorganization plan, and a bankruptcy court must decide whether to confirm the debtor's plan notwithstanding the creditors' objection. 
Priority Withstands Dissent
A bankruptcy court will confirm a debtor's plan for reorganization, over the objection of a dissenting class of senior unsecured creditors, as long as the terms of the Absolute Priority Rule are satisfied.  This means that a court will confirm a debtor's reorganization plan if either (1) the unsecured creditors are paid in full, or (2) the equity holders will not receive any value under the plan.
The New Value Exception
Although not explicitly adopted by the Bankruptcy Code, some courts have recognized the validity of what has come to be known as the New Value Exception to the Absolute Priority Rule.  This exception permits equity holders to receive value under a reorganization plan (such as ownership of the reorganized business), if they contribute additional funds to the debtor and such funds are considered necessary for the success of the debtor's reorganization. 
However, in 1999, the U.S. Supreme Court put a limit on the application of the New Value Exception.  The court held that the exception should not apply to allow an old equity holder to receive value for contributing to the reorganization of a debtor's business, if the equity holder is the "exclusive" participant in reorganization or the only one allowed to contribute to the reorganized entity.

© 2013 NextClient.com, Inc.  All rights reserved.